Even after the Second World War, European attitudes to skyscrapers hardly changed. Even at a time when the problem of a growing housing stock is particularly acute, ravaged Europe needs a lot of modern housing, and high-rise buildings would be a quick and effective way to solve this problem. However, the authorities refused to build high-rise buildings. In West Germany, a decree has been issued prohibiting the construction of buildings taller than city halls. Citizens believe that skyscrapers should never lose air and sunlight. They also decided to limit high-rise buildings in business districts. If a big building is built, then it is mostly to house the poor and the height is limited to 20 stories.
While skyscrapers have long been symbols of wealth, prosperity and progress in the United States, towering buildings in Europe quickly became symbols of poverty and social problems since World War II. The situation is slightly different in Eastern Europe, especially in countries under the influence of the Soviet Union. In the 1950s and '60s, skyriser-like buildings began to be built, especially in Lithuania and Latvia, in a series of so-called medium-height, repetitive and simplified buildings that served residents. This fact, however, is precisely why the first skyscrapers appeared in different European cities, as a reaction against Soviet architects.
According to experts, the most significant and real reason for the lack of skyscrapers in Europe is the so-called "Brussels" phenomenon, a current approach to urban renewal that involves the uncontrolled mass demolition of historic buildings and their replacement with modern ones. The term was first used by journalists in the 1960s and 1970s during the mass demolition of historic buildings in Brussels, planned to coincide with the 58th World's Fair. The decision was made to demolish dilapidated buildings, remove trams and widen alleyways, while the historic centre continued to fall apart and disappear. However, European city centers retain cultural and historic buildings. Current buildings will not appear next to them, so as not to damage their true design. The fate of European skyscrapers lies on the outskirts of cities, but that is changing dramatically every year.
As time slips by, European architecture in the 21st century is experiencing the influence of numerous cultures and the people who inhabit them. Numerous experts even predict a boom in skyscraper construction over the next decade. The ancient conservative view is a thing of the past, and more and more skyscrapers are touching the skies of modern European cities.
Why are there so few tall buildings in Europe?
Why are there no skyscrapers in Europe when there are hundreds of them in every major American city? What's the reason? Is it a tradition or do Europeans have a fear of heights? Today we talked about this strange phenomenon.
If you go to the observation deck of a large European city, you will find a somewhat strange architectural phenomenon. The landscape of a developed city will be a flat expanse of low buildings, and only in some places can you see the tall tower of an ancient church or a television tower. Where are the futuristic modern buildings with the roof holding up the clouds?39bet-kết quả bóng đá-kết quả xổ số miền bắc-kèo bóng đá -soi cầu bóng đá-đặt cược
To answer this question, we must first go back about 100 years. At that time in the United States, around the beginning of the 20th century, skyscraper construction became increasingly common in numerous large cities. Thanks to the invention of the electric elevator, the height of buildings was no longer limited. The Chrysler Building, the Woolward Building and other famous buildings rose one after another in the American sky. The skyscraper immediately became a center of concentration around the economic elite. But in Europe, the architectural fad is viewed with suspicion.
"The ugliness of New York is well known," fumed the German journalist Siegfried Krakauer in 1921. The city is full of behemoths, sprawling, overcrowded and meaningless inside and out. They are seldom less than 15 stories tall, and only government agencies, factories, offices and cinemas are located in such buildings. Conservative Europeans refuse to live in high buildings. There is a current generation of buildings in North America, and European infrastructure is seen by North Americans as an outdated model. In Europe, the opposite is true. Europe sticks to existing ideas. As a result, both continents have avoided mutual acceptance of urban concepts.
Even after the Second World War, European attitudes to skyscrapers hardly changed. Even at a time when the problem of a growing housing stock is particularly acute, ravaged Europe needs a lot of modern housing, and high-rise buildings would be a quick and effective way to solve this problem. However, the authorities refused to build high-rise buildings. In West Germany, a decree has been issued prohibiting the construction of buildings taller than city halls. Citizens believe that skyscrapers should never lose air and sunlight. They also decided to limit high-rise buildings in business districts. If a big building is built, then it is mostly to house the poor and the height is limited to 20 stories.
While skyscrapers have long been symbols of wealth, prosperity and progress in the United States, towering buildings in Europe quickly became symbols of poverty and social problems since World War II. The situation is slightly different in Eastern Europe, especially in countries under the influence of the Soviet Union. In the 1950s and '60s, skyriser-like buildings began to be built, especially in Lithuania and Latvia, in a series of so-called medium-height, repetitive and simplified buildings that served residents. This fact, however, is precisely why the first skyscrapers appeared in different European cities, as a reaction against Soviet architects.
According to experts, the most significant and real reason for the lack of skyscrapers in Europe is the so-called "Brussels" phenomenon, a current approach to urban renewal that involves the uncontrolled mass demolition of historic buildings and their replacement with modern ones. The term was first used by journalists in the 1960s and 1970s during the mass demolition of historic buildings in Brussels, planned to coincide with the 58th World's Fair. The decision was made to demolish dilapidated buildings, remove trams and widen alleyways, while the historic centre continued to fall apart and disappear. However, European city centers retain cultural and historic buildings. Current buildings will not appear next to them, so as not to damage their true design. The fate of European skyscrapers lies on the outskirts of cities, but that is changing dramatically every year.
As time slips by, European architecture in the 21st century is experiencing the influence of numerous cultures and the people who inhabit them. Numerous experts even predict a boom in skyscraper construction over the next decade. The ancient conservative view is a thing of the past, and more and more skyscrapers are touching the skies of modern European cities.
Even after the Second World War, European attitudes to skyscrapers hardly changed. Even at a time when the problem of a growing housing stock is particularly acute, ravaged Europe needs a lot of modern housing, and high-rise buildings would be a quick and effective way to solve this problem. However, the authorities refused to build high-rise buildings. In West Germany, a decree has been issued prohibiting the construction of buildings taller than city halls. Citizens believe that skyscrapers should never lose air and sunlight. They also decided to limit high-rise buildings in business districts. If a big building is built, then it is mostly to house the poor and the height is limited to 20 stories.
While skyscrapers have long been symbols of wealth, prosperity and progress in the United States, towering buildings in Europe quickly became symbols of poverty and social problems since World War II. The situation is slightly different in Eastern Europe, especially in countries under the influence of the Soviet Union. In the 1950s and '60s, skyriser-like buildings began to be built, especially in Lithuania and Latvia, in a series of so-called medium-height, repetitive and simplified buildings that served residents. This fact, however, is precisely why the first skyscrapers appeared in different European cities, as a reaction against Soviet architects.
According to experts, the most significant and real reason for the lack of skyscrapers in Europe is the so-called "Brussels" phenomenon, a current approach to urban renewal that involves the uncontrolled mass demolition of historic buildings and their replacement with modern ones. The term was first used by journalists in the 1960s and 1970s during the mass demolition of historic buildings in Brussels, planned to coincide with the 58th World's Fair. The decision was made to demolish dilapidated buildings, remove trams and widen alleyways, while the historic centre continued to fall apart and disappear. However, European city centers retain cultural and historic buildings. Current buildings will not appear next to them, so as not to damage their true design. The fate of European skyscrapers lies on the outskirts of cities, but that is changing dramatically every year.
As time slips by, European architecture in the 21st century is experiencing the influence of numerous cultures and the people who inhabit them. Numerous experts even predict a boom in skyscraper construction over the next decade. The ancient conservative view is a thing of the past, and more and more skyscrapers are touching the skies of modern European cities.